[펌] 인메모리 캐쉬 서버 성능 비교 - redis, couchbas, memcached, tarantool

highscalability.com에서 인 메모리 캐쉬 서버(redis(azure redis), couchbas, memcached, tarantool)의 성능을  비교했다. 

결론만 보면, my.com이 만든 tarantool (http://tarantool.org/, https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool)이 가장 성능이 좋았다고 한다. 헐..

http://tarantool.org/ 웹페이지 가보면, redis 비교자료가 있으니 참조할 수 있다.

출처 :

http://highscalability.com/blog/2015/12/30/how-to-choose-an-in-memory-nosql-solution-performance-measur.html

Tarantool (HASH), Tarantool (TREE), Redis, Azure Redis Cache, Memcached, CouchBase

Tarantool with both hash and tree indices is the best for all investigated workloads. It creates a lock-free in-memory engine, which does not consist of any mutexes or other concurrency primitives and uses cooperative multitasking. After considering these graphs, we can conclude that high throughput is one of the strengths of the Tarantool database.

Through all tests we executed, Tarantool showed the best result for the count requests per second and for many of tests latency values on any type of examined workloads. Therefore, we can decide that for most of typical projects Tarantool suits them more that popular solutions such as Redis, CouchBase or Memcached. This is the basis of our decision to use Tarantool for our projects here at my.com.